Final changes
This commit is contained in:
parent
ba3d9a45ec
commit
42a05f2d3a
5 changed files with 7 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Here we aimed to utilize the idea of moving our initial @puf measurement values
|
|||
Although this method posed promising results for a sign-based quantization yielding an improvement of $approx 96%$ in our testing, finding a good approach to generalize this concept turned out to be difficult.
|
||||
The first issue was the lack of an analytical description of the probability distribution resulting from the linear combinations.
|
||||
We accounted for that by using an algorithm that alternates between defining the quantizing bounds using an @ecdf and optimizing the weights for the linear combinations based on the found bounds.
|
||||
The loose definition of @eq:optimization to find an ideal linear combination which maximizes the distance to its nearest quantization bound did not result in a stable probability distribution over various iterations.
|
||||
The initial loose definition to find ideal linear combinations which maximize the distance to their nearest quantization bounds did not result in a stable probability distribution over various iterations.
|
||||
Thus, we proposed a different approach to approximate the linear combination to the centers between the quantizing bounds.
|
||||
This method resulted in a stable probability distribution, but did not provide any meaningful improvements to the @ber in comparison to not using any helper data at all.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue