Fixed page numbering, danke Janis <3, started working on the remaining issues
This commit is contained in:
parent
2be84b715f
commit
b8a0ee46f5
20 changed files with 519 additions and 169 deletions
|
|
@ -4,9 +4,11 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Instead of generating helper-data to improve the quantization process itself, like in #gls("smhdt"), or using some kind of error correcting code after the quantization process, we can also try to find helper-data before performing the quantization that will optimize our input values before quantizing them to minimize the risk of bit and symbol errors during the reconstruction phase.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Since this #gls("hda") modifies the input values before the quantization takes place, we will consider the input values as zero-mean Gaussian distributed and not use a CDF to transform these values into the tilde-domain.
|
||||
|
||||
== Optimizing a 1-bit sign-based quantization<sect:1-bit-opt>
|
||||
== Optimizing single-bit sign-based quantization<sect:1-bit-opt>
|
||||
|
||||
Before we take a look at the higher order quantization cases, we will start with a very basic method of quantization: a quantizer, that only returns a symbol with a width of $1$ bit and uses the sign of the input value to determine the resulting bit symbol.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -17,7 +19,7 @@ Before we take a look at the higher order quantization cases, we will start with
|
|||
|
||||
If we overlay the PDF of a zero-mean Gaussian distributed variable $X$ with a sign-based quantizer function as shown in @fig:1-bit_normal, we can see that the expected value of the Gaussian distribution overlaps with the decision threshold of the sign-based quantizer.
|
||||
Considering that the margin of error of the value $x$ is comparable with the one shown in @fig:tmhd_example_enroll, we can conclude that values of $X$ that reside near $0$ are to be considered more unreliable than values that are further away from the x-value 0.
|
||||
This means that the quantizer used here is very unreliable without generated helper-data.
|
||||
This means that the quantizer used here is very unreliable as is.
|
||||
|
||||
Now, to increase the reliability of this quantizer, we can try to move our input values further away from the value $x = 0$.
|
||||
To do so, we can define a new input value $z$ as a linear combination of two realizations of $X$, $x_1$ and $x_2$ with a set of weights $h_1$ and $h_2$:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue